<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>BigTech on Gniewomir Świechowski</title>
    <link>https://gniewomir.com/tags/bigtech/</link>
    <description>Recent content in BigTech on Gniewomir Świechowski</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.8</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gniewomir.com/tags/bigtech/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>AI can screw passive investors</title>
      <link>https://gniewomir.com/posts/ai-can-screw-passive-investors/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://gniewomir.com/posts/ai-can-screw-passive-investors/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;m in a bind. On the one hand, I&amp;rsquo;m a big proponent of passive, boring investing—on the other, this approach taken to the logical conclusion of sitting on my hands steers me toward extreme over-exposure to AI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The main issue is that if you try to have low-maintenance exposure to the global stock market, ~60%+ of your ETF(s) exposure will be toward the USA. Then, ~30%+ of it will be the Magnificent Seven (Nvidia, Alphabet, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, and Tesla). Which is a pretty sizable bet, all of which can be considered an AI play.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
