<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Go on Gniewomir Świechowski</title>
    <link>https://gniewomir.com/tags/go/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Go on Gniewomir Świechowski</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.8</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://gniewomir.com/tags/go/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Well-used AI: the useful bits of atypical wiring — without the productivity tax</title>
      <link>https://gniewomir.com/posts/well-used-ai-the-useful-bits-of-atypical-wiring-without-the-productivity-tax/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://gniewomir.com/posts/well-used-ai-the-useful-bits-of-atypical-wiring-without-the-productivity-tax/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve read a lot of observations from people signaling a similar epiphany I&amp;rsquo;ve been having for a while - that well-used AI allows you to profit from useful bits of atypical brain wiring while lowering friction of problematic ones. Yet, the common approach focusing mostly on &amp;ldquo;what&amp;rdquo; at the cost of &amp;ldquo;why&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;how&amp;rdquo; did not sit well with me. Founder-mindset and clockmaker-mindset are different. Now I feel that I&amp;rsquo;ve built a flow giving me similar benefits, while keeping me honest to what I value.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
